Systematic review and meta-analysis of mesenchymal stromal/stem cells as strategical means for the treatment of COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: In coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, elevated levels of inflammatory cytokines from over stimulation of immune cells have become a concern due to the potential outburst of cytokine storm that damages the tissues and organs, especially the lungs. This leads to the manifestation of COVID-19 symptoms, such as pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), multiple organ failure, and eventually death. Mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) are currently one of hopeful approaches in treating COVID-19 considering its anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory functions. On that account, the number of clinical trials concerning the use of MSCs for COVID-19 has been increasing. However, the number of systematic reviews and meta-analysis that specifically discuss its potential as treatment for the disease is still lacking. Therefore, this review will assess the safety and efficacy of MSC administration in COVID-19 patients. OBJECTIVES: To pool evidence on the safety and efficacy of MSCs in treating COVID-19 by observing MSC-related adverse effects as well as evaluating its effects in reducing inflammatory response and improving pulmonary function. DATA SOURCES AND METHODS: Following literature search across six databases and one trial register, full-text retrieval, and screening against eligibility criteria, only eight studies were included for data extraction. All eight studies evaluated the use of umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stromal/stem cell (UC-MSC), infused intravenously. Of these eight studies, six studies were included in meta-analysis on the incidence of mortality, adverse events (AEs), and serious adverse events (SAEs), and the levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin (IL)-6. Meta-analysis on pulmonary function was not performed due to insufficient data. RESULTS: MSC-treated group showed significantly lower risk of mortality than the control group (p = 0.03). No statistical significance was observed on the incidence of AEs (p = 0.78) and SAEs (p = 0.44), and the levels of CRP (p = 0.06) and IL-6 (p = 0.09). CONCLUSION: MSCs were safe for use, with lower risk of mortality and no association with AEs. Regarding efficacy, descriptive analysis showed indications of improvement on the inflammatory reaction, lung clearance, and oxygenation status despite the lack of statistical significance in meta-analysis of CRP and IL-6. Nevertheless, more studies are needed for affirmation. REGISTRATION: This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered on the PROSPERO database (no. CRD42022307730).

Molecular and hematological studies in a cohort of beta zero South East Asia deletion (ß°-thal SEA) from Malaysian perspective.

Abstract: We report the haematological parameters and molecular characterization of beta zero (ß°) South East Asia (SEA) deletion in the HBB gene cluster with unusually high levels of Hb F compared to a classical heterozygous beta zero (ß°)-thalassaemia. Methods: Retrospective study on 17 cases of (ß°) South East Asia (SEA) deletion from 2016 to 2019 referred to Institute for Medical Research were conducted. The clinical information and haematological profiles were evaluated. The mutation was analyzed, and the results were compared with other ß°-thalassaemia groups. For HBB gene genotyping, all the cases were subjected for multiplex gap-PCR, 5 cases were subjected for HBB gene sequencing for exclusion of compound heterozygous with other beta variants. Co-inheritance of α-thalassaemia were determined using multiplex gap-PCR and multiplex ARMS-PCR. Results: Seventeen cases were positive for ß°-thal SEA deletion. Fifteen cases were heterozygous and two were compound heterozygous for ß°-thal SEA deletion. The results were compared with 182 cases of various heterozygous ß° deletions and mutations. The mean Hb for heterozygous ß°-thal SEA deletion (13.44 ± 1.45 g/dl) was normal and significantly higher than heterozygous IVS 1-1 and Codon 41/42 (post hoc test, p < 0.05). The medians for the MCV and MCH of ß°-thal SEA deletion were significantly higher than for all heterozygote ß°-thalassaemia traits (Mann Whitney test, p < 0.05). Patients with ß°-thal SEA deletion had elevated levels of Hb A2 consistent with ß-thalassaemia traits, with Hb F levels consistent with HPFH or δß-thalassaemia carriers. The median for Hb A2 was 4.00 + 1.00%, similar to that observed in other ß°-thalassaemia groups except for IVS 1-1 mutation (median 5.30 + 0.45%) and ß°-Filipino (∼45 kb deletion) deletion (median 6.00 + 0.58). Interestingly, we found that Hb F levels for ß°-thal SEA deletion were statistically higher than other ß°-thalassaemia mutations (median 19.00 + 5.50%, p < 0.05), except for the ß°-thal 3.5 kb deletion group. Conclusion: We conclude that ß°-thal SEA deletion has a unique haematological parameters of beta zero thalassaemia trait. We affirm to classifying this deletion as SEA-HPFH based on previous studies considering the phenotype features rather than the molecular defect of ß°-thal SEA deletion, as this will make it easier to offer genetic counselling to affected individuals.